Headquarters:
regenold GmbH
Zöllinplatz 4
79410 Badenweiler
Germany
Phone: +49 7632 82 26-0
Fax: +49 7632 82 26-555
Email:
info@regenold.com
Associate Director, Regulatory Strategy
Janet is a self-energised and forward-thinking regulatory strategist with a passion for innovation and collaboration. A qualified pharmacist with a PhD in medicinal chemistry, Janet brings extensive experience across ethical and OTC medicines, and is a Fellow of the professional body TOPRA.
With a strong track record of developing and implementing pragmatic regulatory strategies, Janet thrives in complex and evolving environments – particularly within the post-Brexit landscape. Her leadership style is grounded in integrity and strategic thinking, enabling her to guide international regulatory and technical teams in delivering innovative products across diverse categories.
Janet is a confident communicator and a natural connector, known for building strong internal and external networks. She enjoys working collaboratively to shape solutions that are both compliant and commercially viable, and is committed to advancing regulatory excellence through thoughtful engagement and shared learning.
We have a long history of organising and running MHRA scientific advice meetings (SAMs) for clients both within and outside the United Kingdom. In recent years, many of these meetings have focused on post-Brexit requirements to develop appropriate strategies in line with the changing regulatory landscape since 1 January 2021. Five years on, we are sharing details of the refreshed MHRA scientific advice process for medical devices.
For completeness, we have compared this new guidance with that used for medicines, and included the latest key performance indicators for MHRA scientific advice as well as the associated fees. In our experience, reclassification SAMs (prescription to non-prescription status) do not sit within any backlog and meetings are scheduled promptly.
| Medicines | Medical Devices | |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | 90 minutes | 60 minutes |
| Cost | £986 simple complexity; £17,516 high complexity. Paid at least 15 working days prior to the meeting. | £987. Paid at least 15 working days prior to the meeting. |
| Scope of meeting | Short presentation up to 10 minutes then discussion of questions and issues. | Short presentation up to 10 minutes then discussion of questions and issues. |
| Process | Complete a request form with a complete list of questions (applications will not be processed without these). | Complete a request form with background information and list of questions. |
| Timing of meeting | A mutually agreed date will be set once the MHRA receives the list of questions (current KPI: within 15 working days).* | MHRA will propose a meeting date and time within 15 days. |
| Documentation to be provided | Briefing book and any slide deck at least 15 days before the meeting. | Presentation slides 14 days before the date. |
| Responsibility for meeting minutes | Applicant | Applicant |
| Meeting minutes sent | 15 days post meeting. | 15 days post meeting. |
| Final meeting notes received | 30 days post meeting (current KPI for medicines not currently being met).** | 30 days post meeting. |
* Current KPI suggests date will be agreed within 15 days.
** Current KPI from the agency suggests this timeline for medicines is currently not met.
We note that for scientific advice the latest performance data shows:
In our experience, the timelines for receiving feedback are shortening, although we have waited longer than 12 weeks for feedback in the latter half of 2025.
As with all advice, the agency highlights several caveats. The MHRA's advice is based on the questions and documents submitted and cannot take account of future changes in scientific knowledge or regulatory requirements. Scientific advice from the MHRA is not legally binding for future applications involving the discussed product and should not be viewed as an indication of an agreed future position. Alongside the SAM process there is also the opportunity for fee reductions for Small and Medium Enterprises – particularly attractive for companies beginning a development pathway for a new product or concept – and we can assist with this.
Overall, the medical device process appears to mirror the established and well-tested medicines pathway, although only time will show how experience and performance compare.
We firmly believe the scientific advice process is a valuable chance to shape your product strategy early and avoid costly missteps later. Get in touch with our team so we can support you through the journey.
References: Medicines scientific advice · Medical device scientific advice
Our team has a long track record of organising and running MHRA scientific advice meetings. Get in touch and let us support you through the process.
Speak with an Expert