Our UK team plans, prepares, and manages marketing authorisation applications submitted to the MHRA through UK-specific regulatory routes. Since Brexit, the UK operates its own authorisation pathways with distinct eligibility criteria, assessment timelines, and procedural requirements. For the full description of our MAA methodology, including pathway selection, CTD preparation, benefit-risk assessment, and submission management, see Regulatory Strategy & Operations.
The UK offers several routes to marketing authorisation, each designed for different product types and commercial strategies.
The standard route for products seeking UK-only authorisation. The MHRA conducts an independent assessment of the full CTD. Suitable for products that are not seeking EU authorisation or where the UK market is the primary target.
The IRP allows the MHRA to recognise marketing authorisation decisions made by trusted international regulators, including EMA, FDA, Health Canada, TGA, and others. This can significantly shorten the UK assessment timeline for products already approved in a reference jurisdiction. The IRP is available for new active substances and generics.
ILAP is designed for innovative medicines that address unmet medical need. It provides a toolkit of regulatory support including an Innovation Passport, a Target Development Profile, and enhanced MHRA engagement throughout development. ILAP is not a separate authorisation route but a framework that can be applied alongside any UK submission pathway to accelerate development and assessment.
Our UK team delivers the following within the UK marketing authorisation framework. For our full MAA methodology, including pathway selection, CTD preparation, benefit-risk assessment, and submission management, see the central Regulatory Strategy & Operations page.
UK MAA work is managed by our regenold UK regulatory team, who have direct experience across UK national, IRP, and ILAP submissions. The team works closely with our central regulatory strategy specialists for cross-regional filing coordination.
For the full team, see Our Teams.
Tell us about your product, your target timeline, and whether you are filing in the UK only or in parallel with the EU. We will outline which route fits and how we can support.
Speak with an ExpertThe IRP is typically the fastest for products already approved by a trusted reference authority, such as EMA, FDA, Health Canada, or TGA. The MHRA leverages the existing assessment, which can significantly reduce the UK review timeline. For entirely new products without prior approval elsewhere, the national procedure or ILAP-supported route applies.
Yes. Separate submissions are required, with the MHRA for the UK and EMA or national competent authorities for the EU, but the same core CTD can be used with jurisdiction-specific Module 1 adaptations. We coordinate parallel submissions to align timelines and manage divergent assessment questions.
ILAP is not a separate submission route but an overlay that provides structured MHRA engagement, an Innovation Passport confirming the product meets unmet need criteria, a Target Development Profile developed with MHRA input, and access to rolling review where appropriate. It is designed to accelerate development decisions and reduce regulatory uncertainty for innovative medicines.
UK-authorised products must use MHRA product information templates, which have diverged from EU QRD templates. The UK SmPC, PIL, and labelling must reflect the UK MAH, UK legal status, and any UK-specific standard wording. Companies holding authorisations in both jurisdictions must maintain both sets independently.